Survey 06
Notebook: What Changed This Month
The dated register of the magazine: what changed, in which document, and which page of the site takes it into account.
A magazine that dates its figures owes the reader a place where change is announced, and this page is that place. The notebook is the register of the magazine: one dated entry each time a document behind a page moves, a page is corrected, or a question the desk expected to stay open gets settled by a source. Each entry names the document where the change reads and the page of the site that takes it into account, so a reader who saw the earlier version can find both the change and its reason without writing to ask. Entries carry the date of the reading that produced them, newest first, and they are deliberately short: a register entry that needs summarizing has not been written yet.
What enters the notebook and what does not
Three kinds of event produce an entry. A source moves: a registry republishes its statistics, a standard is revised, a legislative session amends an article this survey cites by number. A page is corrected: a reader challenges a line, the line is reread in its document, and the challenge holds. A reading is completed: a document enters the bibliography, or an old one is read again for a new page. What does not enter is everything else. Opinion, news about individual dogs, and the ordinary work of writing the next article stay off this register, because the notebook records what a reader could otherwise only discover by diffing the site against its own past. The corrections procedure itself, including what counts as grounds for one, is written out in editorial standards, and the documents every entry points back to are collected with their reading dates in the adult screening table and the bibliography it serves.
The other doors of the magazine: The Breed, Health, Adoption, Training and Law and Insurance. Every one of them points back to the screening table.
Dated notes
Readings, corrections and outstanding questions, newest first. Each note names the document where the change reads.
-
August 2026
-
Notebook
The founding issue is online
The magazine opens with the two standing references published: the adult screening table and the checklist of the first thirty days. The standards comparison and the adoption survey carry the rest of the issue. Later entries in this notebook will track the documents as they move.
-
Notebook
The dangerous dog articles, reread together
North Carolina General Statutes 67-4.1 through 67-4.4 have been reread in full for the law survey. The procedure holds as summarized: an owner has three days to appeal a designation and is entitled to a hearing within ten days, and violating the precautions of 67-4.2 is a Class 3 misdemeanor.
-
Notebook
The screening panel keeps its 2019 date
The parent club mandatory practices, as most recently published, remain the 2019 version consulted in 2026. Every line of the screening table therefore carries that reading date, and a newer document would reopen the table line by line before anything else moves.
-
-
July 2026
-
Notebook
What the foster study actually measured
The 2019 study across five American shelters keeps coming up in reader mail, often retold as a decompression rule it never claims. What it reports is rest: even one or two nights in a foster home gave dogs their longest uninterrupted rest of the whole study period. The checklist of the first thirty days is built on that measured thing.
-
Notebook
The UC Davis neutering figures, handled carefully
The 2020 UC Davis study covers 854 Rottweilers in its breed section, with joint disorders reported in 8 percent of intact males and 16 percent of intact females. The published subgroups do not sum to the published total, so the table of the neutering page quotes the total and the subgroups exactly as written, never added together.
-
Notebook
A 2002 cohort, still the reference for bone sarcoma
The bone sarcoma finding quoted across this magazine comes from a 2002 cohort of 683 North American Rottweilers, where dogs of both sexes neutered before one year showed roughly a one in four lifetime risk. It stays the reference because no later cohort of this size covers the breed alone, and it is always presented with its date.
-
Notebook
The grading grid, checked against its publisher
The correspondence between the seven step American hip scale and the A to E ratings of the FCI systems has been checked again against the registry grid. It matters most when an imported dog arrives with paperwork graded in letters, and the glossary now defines both scales side by side.
-
-
June 2026
-
Notebook
Live statistics stay on the live page
The orthopedic registry publishes current breed statistics and updates them continuously. This magazine prints no percentage for the breed without a dated reading of that page, so the health survey points to the live registry figure rather than freezing a number that will be wrong within a year.
-
Notebook
The breed page and the working group
The American Kennel Club places the Rottweiler in the working group, which is verified on the club breed page. The same page carries a life expectancy figure that this magazine does not reprint: a number read without its date of reading ages badly, and the club page is the better source of it.
-
Notebook
The FCI text and the natural tail
The FCI standard number 147, in its 2018 translation, describes the tail in its natural condition. Every photograph on this magazine shows a natural tail, and the standards comparison now explains why the reference text reads the way it does.
-